omlrgb.jpg (47664 bytes)
OML HOME Affiliates Classifieds Legislative News Bulletin Publications About OML

spacer.gif (59 bytes)

Ohio Municipal League
175 South Third Street
Suite 510
Columbus, Ohio 43215


614-221-4349 Office
614-221-4390 Fax

email:
Legislative Inquiries
John Mahoney
General Inquiries
info@omunileague.org

For email inquiries to the OML, it would be most helpful if you would include your name, position, city or village you represent. 

Also please include a phone number and/or address for instances when we need further contact with you.

Please type “OML Inquiry” in subject line so that we can identify e-mails picked up as spam.

OML E- BULLETIN
If you would like to sign up for the E-Bulletin, send an email here:
info@omunileague.org
 In the e-mail, indicate that you would like to be taken off the paper Bulletin list.

FAX BULLETIN

October 30, 2001

PLEASE CIRCULATE THIS BULLETIN TO YOUR COUNCIL, DEPARTMENT HEADS & STAFF

LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES A TARGET

KILOWATT HOUR TAX

The Ohio House of Representatives has commenced its plan to balance Ohio=s budget, at least partially on the back of municipalities. Current law allows municipalities to retain proceeds of the Aelectric Kilowatt-hour tax from consumers inside the municipality. The tax is collected by municipalities with electric utilities. The state currently receives the proceeds of the tax on municipal electric consumers located outside the municipality. The House majority party proposal would change the law so that the tax proceeds currently retained by the municipality would be paid to the state, B an estimated loss of $49 million to Ohio municipalities with electric utilities. It is our view that the proposal is unconstitutional on two basis: (1) It violates the utility powers granted municipalities by Sections 4, 5, and 6 of Article XVIII, Ohio Constitution, since it would interfere with the ownership and operation of a municipal utility (State, ex rel. McCann v Defiance (1958), 167 Ohio St. 313; Columbus v Power Siting Comm., (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2 d. 435; Columbus v Public Utilities Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 427; and (2) It would require the municipality to levy a tax for the benefit of the State of Ohio, which would be for a state public purpose, not a municipal public purpose.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUND TO TAKE ANOTHER HIT

Proposals generated by the Governor and by the House leadership call for the repeal of the dealers in intangible tax. Each county undivided local government fund receives five eights of these taxes paid by dealers in intangibles in the county - in 2000 this amounted to $13.9 million.

Both proposals would subject the dealers in intangibles to the corporate franchise tax which would help the state but only produce $1.8 million for the local government fund.

CALL YOUR OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MEMBER ASAP AND OBJECT TO BOTH OF THESE PROPOSALS.

FYI - The Sales Tax Holiday could hurt those counties levying a local option sales tax. In addition, the 2-day holiday will result in an estimated $35 million in foregone sales tax revenue for the state. Remember, sales tax revenues are a part of the LGF.